Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallacy Check NY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fallacy Check NY[edit]

Delete. Yahoo group that was founded on Feb. 11 of this year. Has only 8 members, and has had no activity in the last 7 days. Only 294 google results for "fallacy check", few of which seem to be relevant (this article is #1) PlasmaDragon 16:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't think of any individual Yahoo groups that should have articles. There probably aren't any. In any case, definitely NN, could probably even have been speedied under A7. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Yahoo group is just a placeholder until the official website is completed. 24.29.81.74 19:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So? Even if it had a website, it would still fail WP:WEB-PlasmaDragon 19:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete; the article gives a good description of the group's position and their reasons for existence. However, if the group was (a) only created a matter of weeks ago (i.e. is relatively new) and (b) the Yahoo! group has had no activity in the past week, this suggests that it has done nothing of note and is still at the formative stages. Have they done anything notable or been written about elsewhere? If not, this article is simply an agenda for a group that have done nothing yet, and as such warrants deletion. Fourohfour 19:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; if and when the group makes a notable website it can be recreated.--Cúchullain t c 22:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete per nom. Fourohfour: just because an article is good (or bad, for that matter) doesn't mean it should be kept (or deleted). --Rory0 96 04:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.