Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falcon Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon Report[edit]

Non-notable - in-house high school TV show - suggest merge John Nagle 03:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a non-notable in-house TV show shown during homeroom in one public high school. Someone added a speedy delete tag; that was deleted. I did a merge into Valley Stream South High School, and put in a "mergeto" tag, but the original poster deleted the tag without explaination. Tried a "mergeto" tag again. Also deleted. It fits well as part of the high school's main entry, and in fact, it's in there now. Suggest deletion. --John Nagle 03:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 03:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As its already been merged, Delete per nom --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as content is duplicated in Valley Stream South High School. -- Vary | Talk 04:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Royboy crashfan 05:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Short high school TV programme is not notable enough to warrant an article of its own. (aeropagitica) 06:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merge, now delete. ProhibitOnions 12:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Arnzy (Talk) 14:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Khoikhoi 05:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure it can be deleted if it's been merged. We have to leave the history to give credit to the authors you know. Redirect might be best. It could always be protected as a redirect if recreation becomes a problem. --kingboyk 17:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Kingboyk about this. The article's a definite deleter, but having been merged we should do a redirect (or, better, a protected redirect) instead. AndyJones 13:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.