Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faithpay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Faithpay[edit]

Promotion of Wikipedia user's webpage and service. A google search of "faithpay" gives 101 hits, which includes Wiki and related pages. Nothing notable. Wikipedia is not a ad space. Would have speedied this, but wasn't sure if it matches criteria. Created by wiki user Adam Woeger (also up for AfD) and Faithpay "creator." Arbustoo 02:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Arbustoo 02:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't even userfy this Ruby 02:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - try http://www.faithpay.com (cited in article) - for a laugh! Camillus (talk) 02:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising. Royboycrashfan 02:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ad. --Ardenn 03:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with anything else Woeger-related. Adrian Lamo · 03:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --kingboyk 03:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without apology. Daniel Case 05:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Shameless self-promotion. Not even worth a userfy, IMHO. --Kinu 06:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would have considered this one for the new WP:PROD process as it looks likely to sail through without a single keep. ++Lar: t/c 08:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even when the source http://www.faithpay.com redirects to the very Wiki article it is sourced as? Arbustoo 11:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.174.224 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 4 February 2006
Delete - and per Arbustoo's research, we may want to consider protecting this against re-creation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ and burn with fire. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, delete the current content then create a redirect to honor system. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 12:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.