Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Hope and Charity (UK band)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 July 27.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Oxymoron⁸³ 09:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faith Hope and Charity (UK band)[edit]

Despite some notable members, fails WP:BAND simple as that. Anna Loggue (talk) 00:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, band is not notable per WP:N or WP:MUSIC. Mh29255 (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: according to [1], their single "Battle Of The Sexes" reached #53 in the UK Singles chart. Does that count as "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart" for WP:BAND or not? --Stormie (talk) 00:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charted means above top 40, thats in the UK. Anna Loggue (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think "charted" has to be necessarily Top 40; I would count #53 as a valid enough chart entry. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take you do not live in the United Kingdom, on radio, the British chart always starts at 40, anything else is ignored, therefore the band has not charted at all. Willirennen (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 01:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per the notability of its members, and the fact that the band charted two singles in the UK. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment notability is not inherited in either direction ("up" or "down"). Thin boy 00 @176, i.e. 03:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that notability is inherited; really, I think that the two chart singles make a (marginally) stronger argument that this group might be notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete as per nom. ~NeonFire372~ (talk) 03:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and, despite the article being over 20 months old, no WP:V or WP:RS. Pigman☿ 06:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, however the 2 members and their manager are notable, but a failed band does not constitute a article here. Willirennen (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Macy's 123 review me 15:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.