Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Rahman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~no consensus~~ keep. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Amended to keep. Stifle (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Faisal Rahman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Fails WP:BIO CptViraj (Talk) 11:54, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 12:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This was speedily kept a week ago. Did that discussion fail to take something into account? --Worldbruce (talk) 12:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Passes WP:NPOL. This has also been established in the nomination a week ago. --MrClog (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is an elected state official, who are inherently notable per WP:NPOL. Also, this was nominated a week ago and kept. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep or Draft per John Wolfson, however failing a keep the article should be made a draft. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article does need improvement, but state legislators pass WP:NPOL #1. Notability is judged by the existence of suitable sources, not just their presence in the current version of the article as written. Bearcat (talk) 13:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Draft I was not sure to vote here as I am the one who nominated the article for deletion previously. It is WP:TOOSOON. Masum Reza^📞 12:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep I cant see what the problem is. The version of the article when it was nominated is completely fine. Subject is/was elected member of legislative assembly, which is verified. Thus fulfilling WP:NPOL. There are no copyrights, or BLP violations. None of the content is unsourced. I am still not sure, are we having this discussion because the article is a stub? —usernamekiran(talk) 07:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.