Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairy Fencer F

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. L Faraone 02:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy Fencer F[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Fairy Fencer F" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 22:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So let's delete every game, movie, TV show, etc. on this here wiki that is not out yet, while we are at it. :/ Dwscomet (talk) 01:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 01:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only articles which have significant secondary source published coverage can be permitted per WP:N. Admittedly some do exist which should not, and this is all the more reason to have them deleted. See WP:OTHERCRAP. Thanks. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 03:09, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: This article can be saved with more third-party references. Let's not burn the house down before it has been built. There is enough notability, and it's better for the article to be improved rather than deleted. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 03:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Per 李博杰. The nom's argument re: WP:BALL has merit too, but given the high-profile names associated with this game I think it has a good chance of actually seeing a release. Anyway in the alternative I !vote merge to Compile Heart#Projects. -Thibbs (talk) 13:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not so sure it can be saved with more third-party references right now. All the sources I can find are very scanty (and so would not comprise significant coverage) or contain self-asserted rumours at best. There seems to very little that can be reliably known at the moment from the sources other than that this game will come out - a product announcement with some rumours thrown in. I agree with Thibbs about the merge. Quite likely after it does come out it will merit its own article, but that the game will come out is of little concern since All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 21:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to Compile Heart. I'm sure this game will be notable eventually, but right now, it's WP:TOOSOON. There's not enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG at this point. Undo the redirect once we get closer to the game's release. (The game was just announced.) Sergecross73 msg me 13:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.