Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfield Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xoloz (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairfield Mall[edit]

Unsourced stub article on a dead mall in Massachusetts. Only sources found were DeadMalls.com and the Labelscar blog, neither of which can really be considered reliable. The "Chicopee Marketplace" that replaced it doesn't seem to meet notability either. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and precedent for notability of malls. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

umm ... per what precedent? please point out the precedent your refering to. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just a dead mall. Malinaccier (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I seem to have found a source, and the reason for its demise. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so add the source. DGG (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was there, just as a link, not as a <ref> ... changed Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as another small US mall. Notability is not established by the reason for closing unless it is really novel and unique. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.