Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fag enabler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moot. This content was deleted by User:Jesse Viviano under CSD G10 partway through the AfD. NAC closure for cleanup reasons by —S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Fag enabler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Westboro does use the term, but I don't see that it in itself has any notability beyond WBC. Can't find any sources discussing the importance of the phrase itself - the only references I find are in relation to WBC's campaign. Even so, it's only one of dozens of phrases WBC uses, so it doesn't seem that this phrase has specific independent notability. I'm also concerned with the BLP issue. NellieBly (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to WBC, or maybe merge with a homophobia-related article. As a standalone article, this is fail on a stick. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete criterion G10 (tagged). Seriously. It's an offensive term and the content is a list of people who are alleged to be described by it. Imagine if the content of Nigger or Jap was a list of people. Guest9999 (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy G10 - for future reference, RFD, not AFD, handles improper redirects. Intelligentsium 20:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page wasn't a redirect at the time the article was nominated ([1]). Guest9999 (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally a redirect, but since it had been expanded into an article I wasn't sure if RFD was the appropriate place to take it. --NellieBly (talk) 20:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.