Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadilah Noor Abbe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fadilah Noor Abbe[edit]

Fadilah Noor Abbe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable old lady. Questionable claim to longevity, and even by the standards of these articles the claim of importance is a real stretch. Other than that, we learn she was scared of surgery and got pneumonia once. WP:NOPAGE. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete what would be remarkable is not getting cateracts while living past 100. Belongs on a list somewhere not a whole page. Legacypac (talk) 07:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOPAGE. Health problems and initial fear of surgery are eminently WP:ROUTINE, as are claims to longevity. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I looked for more reports in Singaporean newspapers, but the best I could find was very doubtful. Nowhere is her purported birth date fully stated, only "her ID card says 1897". No obituary upon her death. One 2010 article states that "her daughter died in her arms in the late 1990s, at the age of 55", while Madam Fadilah "was about 90 years old then", but if she were born in 1897 she would have been about 100 years old in the "late 1990s". Not ripe for Wikipedia. — JFG talk 08:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:BIO1E, only "notable" for claiming to live to age X. Like most of these longevity claims, cannot be expanded beyond "born, claimed age X, died". This article tells us more about other supercentenarian claims than it does about her and it stretches the whole "fear of surgery" thing to try to pad this article. But again, there is nothing to say about her. CommanderLinx (talk) 12:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - One of those who were known only for claiming themselves to be oldest or very old. These subjects lack significant coverage especially when we take their extraordinary claims into account. This is similar to other recently nominated articles. Rzvas (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.