Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facundo Bagnis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facundo Bagnis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NTENNIS Mayumashu (talk) 23:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NTENNIS. Not Davis Cup matches that I can find; no matches at top ATP level. Ravendrop (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now that references have been found to say he has played in the main ATP tour, therefore passing WP:NTENNIS Ravendrop 02:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The funnest thing is the only reference is about Cueves. KnowIG (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Recently played two matches of the ATP World Tour, I revised article and added the reference. According to WP: NTENNIS (The player has competed in the main draw in one of the major professional tournaments). Jonas kam (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn as per confirmation of User:Jonas kam's assertion. Mayumashu (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. The nominator has withdrawn but there are outstanding delete !votes. I'll ask those editors to revisit this discussion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"sigh" I just noticed that one of the !voters has been blocked for a week with talk page access revoked. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.