Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of maths,computer science -University Guelma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Faculty of maths,computer science -University Guelma[edit]

Faculty of maths,computer science -University Guelma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incomprehensible, no context, promotional content. WP:TNT? Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Science, Mathematics, Computing, and Algeria. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There have been so many drafts and moves and redirects in this mess that I've lost track. Which is not a reason to delete anything. Neither is the draft being badly written (which it patently is). What is, however, a reason to delete is that this draft has no evidence of notability, even after all this to'ing and fro'ing. And while universities might make some claim for inherent notability, individual faculties, schools, departments, etc. do not, and indeed are seldom found to be notable. Which, I believe, is the case also here. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Meeting the relevant standard is an uphill struggle for units within universities; how often does anyone other than the university itself talk about a department as such? When is there so much to say that a page is warranted? I see no evidence that this is an exception to the general trend. XOR'easter (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete per above. It is both incomprehensible and not notable. Chamaemelum (talk) 19:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. Also, I don't see much point in redirecting to University of Guelma. Deckkohl (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.