Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factor world

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Factor world[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term seems like just a new name for an already existing model. Also, there are no "content" editions since the creation of the article in 2006. Google of the term leads to nothing relevant. Hence, Delete per WP:NOTDIC and WP:Notability. Geeteshgadkari (talk) 11:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 01:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no secondary sources found. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Tom Reedy (talk) 03:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.