Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Face Baukchoice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as obvious hoax. нмŵוτн τ 20:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Face Baukchoice[edit]

Hoax. See Google. скоморохъ ^ѧ 22:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete WP:CSD Criteria 1 = HOAX. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle tells me CSD 1 is not to be used for hoaxes. Que pasa? скоморохъ ^ѧ 22:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOw does 3. strike you then?? in the criteria for 1. though it does clearly state "hoaxes"? -- but so does 3. which seems to fit this article even better =) . Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 says specifically not hoaxes, but you're right, in retrospect I should've 3'd it. скоморохъ ^ѧ 23:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, it will be deleted in good time anyway? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hoax. "Facebook choice", yeah, right. JohnCD (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 23:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable see [1]. Capitalistroadster (talk) 23:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be a hoax. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete as hoaxalicious™. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete dumb. JuJube (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.