Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FaceRecog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FaceRecog[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small startup. Some coverage around Tech in 2014 Asia’s Startup Asia Singapore - where they won a prize. Not much else. Not close to meeting WP:NCORP. Note I AfDed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhd Amrullah (the founder) as well.Icewhiz (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Icewhiz (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with nom. Nothing else to add. MaskedSinger (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Note WP:CORPDEPTH which states "Examples of trivial coverage that do not count toward meeting the significant coverage requirement ... brief or passing mentions, such as ... non-notable awards received by the organization, its people, or products ... [and] presentations, speeches, lectures, etc. given by organization's personnel ... [and] other listings and mentions not accompanied by commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization." --Puzzledvegetable|💬|📧|📜 22:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Dose not have significant coverage, is not a notable company. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.