Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabrizio Federico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for inadequate notability. Der yck C. 17:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fabrizio Federico[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think that Fabrizio Federico is notable enough to warrant such a page on Wikipedia. He appears to have created it himself, and further edited himself into pages tangentially relevant to him (Harmony Korine, The Last Movie and Dogme 95). Surely Wikipedia is not for publicizing of this nature?

He appears to be, at best, a unknown filmmaker from the UK with a lot of ambition. I don't feel however that his current status warrants such a lengthy article (however perhaps further down the line)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 13. Snotbot t • c » 17:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural close as the nominator hasn't nominated an existing article, they must have meant to nominate this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabrizio_Federico Seasider91 (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable filmmaker who hasn't won any major awards or made anything notable, I have fixed the problem link as well Seasider91 (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. 19:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search doesn't bring up enough sources to show notability for this director. I found one source (which is already in the article), but predominantly everything shows up as primary sources, junk hits, and other non-notability giving links. Fails notability guidelines. On a side note, the nominator is right in that the original editor has taken it upon themselves to try to put the director into as many articles as possible.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Probably the best source is the Leftlion article, and that's a community culture / arts web site. That's just not enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.