Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabiana de Barros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabiana de Barros[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Studied at notable places, related to notable people, but notability is not inherited. Boleyn (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources in the article are primary or don't even mention the subject. I couldn't find any significant coverage. Of the sources I found, virtually all were mentions of Fabiana de Barros in the context of her father Geraldo de Barros. WP:NOTINHERITED. Jfire (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not finding any reliable sources for this article. It is a promotional article. I agree that the existing sources are weak or fail verification.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.