Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FORUS Athletics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 22:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FORUS Athletics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD over whether this meets WP:CORP. There is coverage by one reliable source. However, the guideline requires coverage by multiple, third-party reliable sources. Singularity42 (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reeks of being a commercial. If we redirected the article to the company website it wouldn't be any more promotional sounding. No evidence of signifcant coverage by reliable third party sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia guidelines. I didn't see any notable coverage results on both Google and Yahoo. If the article can supplied with third party mentions, then the article has potential. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SwisterTwister's reasoning. The article can be re-written once more notable sources surface, but so far 90% of it is "sourced" by the company's own webpage, and it is mostly non-encyclopedic material. In its current state there is little information salvageable to create an unbiased article, and that information alone will not meet notability criteria. Rymatz (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.