Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMYI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 09:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FMYI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable company / software product that lacks independent 3rd party coverage. What comes are is PR driven (Portland BizJournal, Medium) and / or trivial mentions, such as in this Computerworld blog post, in passing. Promo content includes: "Current and former clients include: Nike, Sony, HBO,[5] Aflac, Hyatt,[6] the United Kingdom's National Health Service,[7] and MTV's Room Raiders.[3]" etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see a promotional article on a smallish company, with the structure and sourcing commonly used to WP:MASK lack of notability. Furrykiller (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you previously edited Wikipedia under a different handle? Unscintillating (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.