Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLATSTOCK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Cbrown1023 14:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FLATSTOCK[edit]

lack of notability, possible advertisement Chris 03:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seems to violate Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Orderinchaos78 03:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Merge Didn't realise American Poster Institute had an article. Merge into that - but please don't take that blocky list across :) Orderinchaos78 11:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak provisory keep~~ per "I've heard of it." It's a somewhat major event at SXSW, so sources should be available. I'll see what I can find. Also, kill the all-caps and tone down the ad-lingo (possible copyvio?). ~ trialsanderrors
- Redirect to American Poster Institute (which itself needs sourcing). There's quite a couple of media mentions (67 on Newsbank), but only the Seattle Times article about Flatstock. ~ trialsanderrors 04:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

support merge back into American Poster Institute, with major linking and wikifying, as per trialsanderrors Chris 05:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect Davidpdx 11:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.