Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIMKrypto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FIMKrypto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod, so AfD it is. Unremarkable cryptocurrency. Not much coverage outside of primary sources. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 03:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was about to CSD this when I saw the blip while NPP. Google has zip, there's nothing widely covered here. Just looks like it's something that's trying to beat BitCoin but isn't notable yet. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 03:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 04:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 04:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There do not seem to be any WP:RS that this passes WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to be pure advertising with no established notability. JIP | Talk 05:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:32, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as seems to be more advertising than anything, No evidence of notability so fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.