Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FEDGOV
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 15:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
FEDGOV[edit]
- FEDGOV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia articles are not ... Usage, slang, and/or idiom guides. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOTDICT. Poorly sourced at that.TheLongTone (talk) 10:15, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 16:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 16:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Federal government of the United States. Shouldn't be its own article per WP:NOTDICT, but it seems like a plausible redirect. Kolbasz (talk) 17:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:DICTIONARY. I don't think it should be redirected either, it can't warrant a redirect. I can't imagine anyone using the redirect. st170etalk 17:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Federal government of the United States. There's no indication whatsoever that this term is notable—not a single relevant secondary source has been provided. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.