Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Twin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

FC Twin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

FC Twin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was looking at this as part of writing a blurb for the featured picture which accompanies the article, and as far as I could tell there's a lack of significant coverage of this console, I couldn't really find any sources on which to construct a complete article. Many of the sources that are in the page currently don't really refer to this particular console, more general info about famiclones, while those that do mention it directly such as [1] and [2] are just lists of games that work on the console and a passing mention. I'm happy to be corrected if there are more serious sources around though.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Products. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

• Delete - Doesn't seem to be any actual sourcing besides the ones used in the article. And it overrelies on one source too many times so its notability is really questionable. GamerPro64 20:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.