Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. M. Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F. M. Khan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much coverage, very promotional. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. Störm (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't pass WP:GNG, so its a delete by me. M A A Z T A L K 13:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks any usable sources in the article and my own search is not much better. I found this blog posting discussing the book "The Story of Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral", but this is not a reliable source. Worldcat shows editons of the book. Two are in English and two are in Urdu. The holdings are scant. The English versions are held in 13 libraries, and the Urdu version in 2 libraries. I don't see being the author of this book as a claim to notability. The other claims to notability are unclear. Being on the board of directors for a chamber of commerce isn't really a strong claim. The claim of being a successful businessman provides no specifics to investigate. Writing some newspaper articles is not a good claim for notability either. The three external links are not useful. The first is a link to the main page of the chamber of commerce; not at all useful. The second is a letter to the editor written by the subject and and the third is a response letter; again not useful. -- Whpq (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.