Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Félix Malpica Valverde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. (aeropagitica) 21:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Félix Malpica Valverde[edit]

Delete Unverifiable statements of fact. Not notable enough. Probably will loose this one, but looks highly suspect at best. San Saba 20:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save Whoa - don't delete the guy (he's real), delete the unverifiable statements. I'll do what I can to try to verify this stuff from Español websites. This is not [completely] Mexican nonsense. - Eric 00:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - can't see any reason to delete. Stifle 01:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
King of Hearts | (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just because he isn't an american radio personality dosen't mean he dosen't exist. Looks notable enough to me, just needs a little TLC. Mike _{(T C)} 07:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity and listcruft at its best. Royboy crashfan 07:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Mike. Eivind 11:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sounds good and notable. Roy's too rough. Crzrussian 13:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 32 years of running Líderes de Opinión, on radio and television, incl Grupo FM Radio, Veracruz.seems pretty notable to me. [1] Dlyons493 Talk 20:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.