Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezra Howard
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Ezra Howard[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ezra Howard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Whilst being twentieth in the list of Peruvian YouTubers in terms of subscriber count is a claim to notability enough to escape WP:A7, I'm not seeing enough for WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:NBASIC. I have searched for sources and conclude that the ones currently cited are the best. Source analysis to follow, which will explain why he fails NBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, Entertainment, Internet, and Peru. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Source analysis - fails NBASIC by a long way Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete agree with the above analysis of sources. Oaktree b (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Spiderone's source analysis accurately explains why the cited sources don't contribute toward notability, and my search found only a few more passing mentions. Fails WP:BASIC/the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.