Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezra Edelman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 01:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ezra Edelman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only production credit is a redlinked show on a redlinked network. Prod declined. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per reasons above. Also, PROD was deleted by the creator, so yeah... Purple backpack89 05:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, speedy close, trout slap the nominator for acute and chronic noncompliance with WP:BEFORE. HBO is not a "redlinked network", although HBO Sports is a production company that may have no independent notability; and the progam was "redlinked" only because the article author made an easily-fixed error in the title. Even more important, the article subject is rather rather well-known, and quite notable, for other projects, including the widely reviewed [1] and multiple Emmy-winning [2] Brooklyn Dodgers: Ghosts of Flatbush. Experienced editors should be improving the work of well-meaning inexperienced ones, not mindlessly and inappropriately tagging their work for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

personal abuse from an i.p. address removed DGG ( talk ) 05:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just have a grudge and a half against me don't you? I looked and didn't see anything that said "Emmy". Clearly my google-fu is abysmal. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close per meeting WP:ANYBIO through award wins. The redlink was certainly easy enough to fix, and his winning two Emmy Awards is easy enough to source... as it took maybe 18 secinds to verify.[3] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close per Schmidt.4meter4 (talk) 12:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.