Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezekial 25:17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. The other article will need to be nominated separately. ---J.S (T/C) 03:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ezekial 25:17[edit]

Ezekial 25:17 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

WP:NOT#IINFO - In particular, I don't see why this bible passage is independantly notable from the main article on Ezekial, let alone why it is important (other than the quote, which I don't consider that important either. --Sigma 7 03:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Thou hath not shown thine notability. -WarthogDemon 05:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • Under what standard? We have no notability guideline for bible verses. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nor do we have any way of saying this verse is any more notable any other verse from the Bible. -WarthogDemon 06:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • For some reason I didn't notice the mispelling until now. I change my vote. Speedy Redirect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WarthogDemon (talk • contribs).
  • Redirect to Ezekiel 25:17. (aeropagitica) 06:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy redirect to Ezekiel 25:17. MER-C 06:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. Seems like reasonable misspelling. --Brad Beattie (talk) 09:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We don't need redirects from every possible combination of Bible chapter and verse. Ezekial already redirects to Book of Ezekiel. Just get rid of it. --Dhartung | Talk 21:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ezekial. Can't we delete Ezekial 25:17 also (and while we are at it Genesis 1:1 and other quotes in Category:Bible Verses)? It is not one of the more important bible quotes like John 3:16 that could be expanded to warrent its own page. Cnriaczoy42 21:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Definately no to Genesis, that page is huge and it's like the first verse! Cbrown1023 22:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Cbrown1023 22:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ezekial 25:17. It seems to me that this article exists only because someone didn't know how to spell "Ezekiel" -- Ben 00:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy redirect to Ezekiel 25:17.    GUÐSÞEGN   – UTEX – 00:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Redirect to Ezekiel 25:17, this can be considered a plausible misspelling.-- danntm T C 00:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete along with Ezekiel 25:17 given that both of these only exist for an extraordinarily stupid item of film trivia (which arguably wouldn't be kept in Book of Ezekiel) both of these can go. as above, we often do need, serious, articles on particular verses to keep down the size of the book article. the 'notability' standard for biblical verses is just an extension of the ussual: does it get a lot of mentions  ⇒ bsnowball  07:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and also delete Ezekiel 25:17 though I'm too lazy to nominate it. Some Bible verses deserve their own articles but this one doesn't. JamesMLane t c 08:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ezekial_25:17&oldid=1142194752"