Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes of Noctum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 01:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes of Noctum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable band. CSD was contested and another editor said "A couple of these sources are reliable, but none of them are significant". In my view, that's worthy of raising a full discussion to see if there is anything else. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N/WP:BAND and WP:V. We have a few sources, but they're either musician databases with no content, or trivial references. I was unable to find significant reliable sources. Woodroar (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If you couldn't find sources, then you didn't look. I Am A Sandwich (talk) 23:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A trivial mention (for a news search) and a questionable source (from books) do not indicate notability for this band. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom and Woodroar: fails WP:BAND. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.