Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeSpot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Fails WP:CORP and/or WP:WEB. RasputinAXP c 14:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EyeSpot[edit]

Self-promo page to a for-profit company that was started in only 2005. No pages link to this. Clubmarx | Talk 05:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete, site with Alexa rank 49,179, failing WP:WEB. Site claims to have been featured in some sites, but I am not sure if any of those are notable enough. Without this, fails WP:CORP. If anyone can correct my assumption that none of the sites where the product has been featured are notable, I am willing to change my vote. -- ReyBrujo 05:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficiently notable. Zaxem 10:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not Delete. This is a factual article about a valid company offering a valid service in an emerging area of technology. The Wikipedia offers a disservice by denying a factual entry such as this one. -- frankatca 12:00 EDT, 6 May 2006

Wikipedia is not many things: not a search engine, not a index of "new-and-exciting" technologies, and not an advertising forum. Delete as failing WP:CORP. -- MarcoTolo 18:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Zaxem. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MarcoTolo. Stifle (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One reason Wikipedia can be great, is its potential for being timely with new, valid information, a criteria that might well be added to WP:CORP to improve it. Less than three months after coming out of stealth mode, GOOGLE now (May 8th) shows 756 links to "www.eyespot.com" and a GOOGLE search on [eyespot 'video editing'] produces several pages of references. Since this entry is factual and NOT promotional, and provides valid information, I suggest this one needs some time for the for the greater evidence to build that is recommended by WG:CORP. frankatca 19:22 EDT, 8 May 2006
Comment There are only 112 sites linking to www.eyespot.com, counting blogs and forums, according to Google. Although it may grow fast, as I always say, first notability, then article. It needs more time for sure. But first gather the evidence and then build the article. -- ReyBrujo 01:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.