Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeSee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 16:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EyeSee[edit]

EyeSee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, and I don't believe there are any reliable, independent, in-depth sources provided. There actually is a product called "EyeSee" that has been covered in the press, but appears to be unrelated to this. My own searches turn up nothing on this company. I think this fails WP:CORP. mikeman67 (talk) 16:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now at least until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom and SwisterTwister. Like Mikeman67, I feel it appears that the hits I get on search engines do not relate to this topic. Onel5969 TT me 13:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.