Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Limits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jim Wynorski. Never close on one !vote however participation has been extremely low here and I don't think relisting for another week will gain any new !votes, The Keep isn't exactly compelling nor strong and last but not least Redirect is always prefferred over deletion so with all this in mind I'm closing as Redirect. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme Limits[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability meeting WP:NFILMS; content largely uncited; closest to RSes are a pile of reviews saying it's a not very good to bad film (but no evidence it's significant as a bad film). I'm willing to be convinced, but this doesn't David Gerard (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It should stay as would any other film Wasabi,the,one (talk • contribs) 02:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC) Wasabi,the,one (talk) 02:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jim Wynorski, who directed it under an alias. Wynorski makes cheap B movies that struggle to establish notability, though a few have cult followings. This seems to be one of the more obscure ones. Yes, it's fun to rip on Wynorski's films, but a bunch of self-published reviews from blogs can't satisfy WP:NFILM. Looking over this solicitation for writers at the most cited source, digitallyobsessed.com, it sounds like they recruit from their readership. I found this review from DVD Talk, but that's about the best that seems to be out there. The other sites that I usually check for direct-to-DVD reviews don't even have this cataloged. Deletion is also acceptable, but if that happens, I'll probably just create a redirect, anyway. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.