Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/External quality assessment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External quality assessment[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only two (2) sources. The first has been moved. The second goes nowhere. This article also appears to be original research or synthesis. DarklitShadow (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Management. DarklitShadow (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any relation to my other open AFD (closed as keep) (here) is purely a coincidence. DarklitShadow (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO and WP:OR. The first source is social media. Bearian (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.