Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extentia Information Technology

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 May 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extentia Information Technology[edit]

Mostly procedural nomination - a similar article was deleted previously by PROD (borderline spam) then recreated. The recreated article was tagged for speedy under WP:G11, blatant advertising, and I was about to click the button when I noticed the deletion log. Bringing this to the community; my opinion is delete. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team, please cut out all information that you think are spam or advertising. The truth is, Extentia is well known for its social activities and the sakaar programm here in Pune. While writing this article I geared to this article InfoBeans . Please advice steps to make this article stable. Thanks, Pradeep80 (talk) 05:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What we need are independent and reliable sources that document this particular subject in depth. Sources! Sources! Sources! Uncle G (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mayalld (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 20:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sorry, but there do not appear to be any reliable sources to prove thus is a notable company. Do you have any articles in trade and popular newspapers, other that those small notes in the "External links" section? Bearian (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.