Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore-A-Quest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explore-A-Quest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A series of self published books with no reliable references to be found. Only social media, online book stores and the author's Kickstarter campaign for the books. Does not pass WP:NBOOK. Prod was removed for unknown reasons. Bgwhite (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find nothing to show why this series is ultimately notable. Like so many self-published book, there has been no coverage in reliable sources and no reviews in places that we'd consider to be usable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Far far below the threshold of notability. QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources, fails to meet WP:NBOOK, no claims of notability, and also no media coverage that would confirm notability. Alex^{discussion ★} 09:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails the basic notability requirements. Pichpich (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet wp:gng and WP:NBOOK. Mr RD 20:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.