Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expliseat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 21:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expliseat[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Run-of-the-mill manufacturing company making aircraft seats. No indications of notability. The awards appear non-notable. References are not intellectually independent and fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — weak vote. The Air & Space Mag and the Aviation Week articles help establish that the company is real and has a non-trivial product. But I fail to find a source that directly covers the topic (the company) in an independent way. Ariadacapo (talk) 11:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Just a promotional directory listing. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.