Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expert sourcing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, unambiguous advertising (and breathless patent nonsense to boot). - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Expert sourcing[edit]
- Expert sourcing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:OR and WP:NOT#MANUAL. Ironholds (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Another "how to" Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 06:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Tbhotch, also appears to be a non notable concept. That's without mentioning the spam links to innovaglobal. [[CharlieEchoTango]] 06:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - Blatant COI as the author mentions himself and his company's website, which also makes it a G11 candidate. -- Alexf(talk) 15:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.