Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expert Patent Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expert Patent Law[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP and WP:ADVERT. The sources are either primary or look incredibly unreliable. Comatmebro (talk) 03:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails corporate notability. The sources appear to be non-independent. Not quite a speedy A7 or G11, but close. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any plausible claim to notability. TJRC (talk) 20:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.