Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experience design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to User experience design. The direction of the merge can be discussed on the respective talk pages. Randykitty (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Experience design[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pure business jargon, without any definite meaning DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic may well seem vacuous but it is so notable that there are numerous books about it and a selection of titles follows. If people are able to write entire books about something then it shouldn't be difficult for us to summarise them. I fancy that a good designer would not look kindly on Wikipedia's current user experience. See WP:BITE... Andrew D. (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Experience Design: A Framework for Integrating Brand, Experience, and Value
Agile Experience Design
Agile User Experience Design
Adventures in Experience Design
Digital Experience Design
User Experience Design
Eye Tracking in User Experience Design
Experience Design: Concepts and Case Studies

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to user experience design. The very first sentence calls this "the practice of designing [..] with a focus placed on the quality of the user experience and culturally relevant solutions." As it happens, we already have an article about that. I'm not seeing any meaningful encyclopedic distinction. There is also interaction design, which is related. My !vote would be merge if more of the content were sourced, and I wouldn't be opposed to a close as selective merge. The !vote above, and the sources that accompany it, only serve to show the notability of user experience design rather than why this should be a separate article beyond that. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the wrong way round as the experience design page is older than the user experience design page, having been created in 2005. The source titles above also indicate that the shorter title is more common. Per WP:REDUNDANTFORK, it's the more recent article which should be merged into the older one. Andrew D. (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW I don't have a strong feeling over which direction it should be merged I'm seeing a lot of results for both search, even though many of them are talking about the same thing. I'll leave a message on that talk page since we're talking about it. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.