Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exopack Advanced Coatings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Neıl ☎ 15:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Exopack Advanced Coatings[edit]
- Exopack Advanced Coatings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable company Excariver (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- '
Comment'.Being a manufacturer of "unique specialty films" is a claim to notability, and the references and external links seem to demonstrate at least a bit of notability. --Eastmain (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
agree with eastmain, when readers looking for information or reference to the field or industry, will find it useful, esp. most of the related terms used links to further explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.98.201.6 (talk) 10:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article has been improved. --Eastmain (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there are no reliable sources to demonstrate notability outside of the company or its products. It might be improved, but it still promotional in tone and content, and so fails WP:SPAM.--Gavin Collins (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.