Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy. Page is now at User:Psyc452-GGeorge/Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions. J04n(talk page) 00:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR content fork of reciprocal altruism written for a class. Note that this article and related articles have very recently been the subject of a thread at Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as content fork of reciprocal altruism per nominator. This is not a likely search term and deletion would seem preferable to redirection. Carrite (talk) 16:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the apparently related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary psychology of Personality AfD has just closed as userfy. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article would serve well as the main page for topic of non-kin group interactions as it pertains to reciprocity and under an evolutionary psychology standpoint. While the research provided in this article is not as extensive as perhaps other evolutionary psychology articles on wikipedia, it does manage to file out a good amount of substantial research information on the subject. There is not a huge amount of research on this topic to begin with. I vote the article remains standing and that as users approach it in the future, they simply add to it to increase its credibility as the main page for the topic. Comment added by User:LochNess14. —Preceding undated comment added 19:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC) (Copied from the talk page Stuartyeates (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Userify In hindsight, our time would have been better spent improving the Reciprocal Altruism article. Like most of the Psyc-452 articles, ours is just a collection of research on a specific subtopic. Not up to Wikipedia standards, it's unfocused. Psyc452-GGeorge (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to Wikipedia:Articles for creation may be better than userfication, since there's a framework for on-going support, but it's your choice. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.