Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary Psychological Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evolutionary Psychological Science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Article dePRODded because the journal is published by Springer. However, WP:NOTINHERITED applies and even Springer starts the occasional dud (see Research on Language and Computation for an example of a journal that failed after only 7 years - even though that one gained notability through a Scopus listing). At this point, there's no way of knowing whether this journal will make it and become notable or not. Randykitty (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NJOURNALS. Might be notable in the future, but as of now WP:TOOSOON applies. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now but draft and userfy if needed as there's simply no better sourcing to improve. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and per Headbomb. Wikipedia is not a directory of journals. WP:NOT. --Bejnar (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.