Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil doom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW, WP:IAR, WP:WHATEVER. Not speedy-able, but there is no content that meets the inclusion criteria. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evil doom[edit]

Ostensibly a book written by a 14 year old. No WP:BOOK criteria met. Barely gets past A1 speedy deletion. Vianello (talk) 03:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - are you sure this isn't speediable? This AfD is not going to last five days... - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response. I've tried my best to sort it out, believe me. But there isn't anything that sticks. It's not any of the "no notability established" ones. It's not pure vandalism, or a hoax. It's not an attack page. It's not nonsense. It's not empty or contextless. So far as I can tell, it just plain doesn't meet any criteria. Five days is a long time for an article that doesn't belong here for five minutes, but procedure is procedure, unless an admin would like to just WP:SNOW this whole issue. - Vianello (talk) 03:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it meets no WP:BOOK criteria, how about trying a A1 rationale for speedy since there is no context.--Finalnight (talk) 03:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response. No, unfortunately, it provides its context. It's some book the page creator (I assume) claims to have written or wants to write. That's as much context as plenty of legitimate stubs give. - Vianello (talk) 03:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not as sure, it mentions no publication date, no location, no specifics, its like a pretend book or something.--Finalnight (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it is nonsensical: "K.A.T. is a Special force team K.A.T. means killing at time the team leader is Dylan caver who plays an important caption". What the??--Finalnight (talk) 03:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G1. This is enough of a mess that I think it's at least worth trying for a G1. Google it; it's someone's video(s) that they've uploaded to the net. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And if you read the diffs, the article creator deleted the A1 tag before a syop could see it.--Finalnight (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy - I could really care less what criteria it is speedied under --T-rex 04:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see this as speediable - not truly patent nonsense, just poorly written - but I will diplomatically posit that the subject is not capable of being reliably sourced. Townlake (talk) 05:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Might just fail getting speedied, but it clearly has to go as quickly as possible. Alberon (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.