Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Eye of Avalon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Features of the Marvel Universe. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Eye of Avalon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional item from the Marvel Universe. No real world context and I severally doubt sources exist to establish real world context. Ridernyc (talk) 21:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A large number of pages link this this page. It is notable. Where did you search for sources? I found several secondary and tertiary sources doing a quick google search. The article can be expanded and sources added. 42of8 (talk) 06:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you say the same exact thing in everyone of these debates I am now forced to cut and paste a very long detailed reply to you in all of these AFDs. 42of8, please read WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:GNG. As you read them please keep in mind we also need real world context in the article. For example the creator saying something like "I needed a super strong metal, and it needed a cool name so I took the name Prometheus and add "um" to the end of it." In order to be encyclopedia the articles need to be about our real world and how the subjects were developed and published not just summaries of their fictional elements in a fictional universe. Sorry but I'm tired of you repling with the same basic reply of WP:Ilikeit and heres a bunch of primary, unreliable sources that I found in Google that just mention the subject in passing and have no real world information about the subject. It's the same over and over again, and I have repeatedly taken the time to explain to you why these sources fall short and then in the next AFD there is your same exact argument again. I like it and heres a bunch of stuff I found in Google. Ridernyc (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as non-notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Features of the Marvel Universe, though deletion is still acceptable to me. I don't think this topic is notable enough to warrant its own article, and a merge would solve that issue. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge into Features of the Marvel Universe. BOZ (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to not establishing notability. TTN (talk) 16:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sourcing. Could be merged, as above. Nwlaw63 (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.