Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everything or Nothing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not sure what "self-promotional" is, but the deletes have the numbers and the arguments (chart per hullabaloo). Drmies (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything or Nothing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn, fails WP:ALBUM and the GNG. Artist article recently deleted, but not quite eligible (maybe) for A9 deletion. No independting sourcing beyon cursory allmusic listing, which is not enough to demonstrate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion. Consider changing to re-direct to James Bond 007: Everything or Nothing. RCraig09 (talk) 18:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on my radar as non-notable, self-promotional, fails WP:NALBUMS and the GNG as there is not significant coverage by secondary sources. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 10:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Yes, it is self-promotional. But it can make a claim for notability (in the text itself). Sophiahounslow (talk) 08:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Notability: significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 09:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep #20 on iTunes Pop Albums chart should be good enough per Wikipedia:NALBUMS#Recordings; however, I was not able to verify this. Does anyone know a way to access historical iTunes charts, from 2008-2009? Willing to extend benefit of doubt. If chart ranking proves bogus, delete. Listmeister (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Badcharts#Deprecated_charts, a guideline, retailer-specific charts, including iTunes, are not indicators of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One reference re #20 iTunes charting: SalutMagazin (Romania) (English translation at bottom)

Another reference: GossipOnThis (Wordpress platform, but not open-source personal blog)

FYI: album was released only on iTunes. RCraig09 (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 19:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or per nominator. This albumn is not charted on any national or significant music or sales charts. iTunes is not considered such a chart. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 00:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.