Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everybodys Jesus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sort of withdrawn by nominator, but consensus is to keep the article anyway. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 15:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everybodys Jesus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This and Everytime (Butterfingers song) are singles notable for charting on the Triple J Hot 100 of the year, this chart is not mentioned on WP:Record charts and so is not a significant sales chart as dictated by WP:NSONGS criterion #1. Laun chba ller 08:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Given that Everybodys Jesus has actually charted on the AIR charts they satisfy WP:NSONG - thanks Peter James - it's just Everytime now.--Laun chba ller 07:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's Dan arndt who should be thanked for that, I haven't edited that page. Peter James (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I'm not sure about this, as I can't find much coverage. For musicians, charts are almost a guarantee of notability but for songs less so, as it depends on the amount that can be written based on the sources and the content can exist whether in a separate article or not. One more source of significant coverage would probably be enough, but if there's no more than what is currently cited, maybe it should be merged. Peter James (talk) 13:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The single charted both on the ARIA Charts and the AIR Charts (both are which are National charts) therefore satsifying Criteria #1 of WP:NSONG. The song, "Jesus I Was Evil" was originally released by Darcy Clay (peaking at No.5 on the NZ singles charts) before being released by Butterfingers therefore satisfying Criteria #3 of WP:NSONG. The fact that it charted No.69 on the Hottest 100 for 2005 supports that the claim that the song reecieved high rotation on the national radio network.Dan arndt (talk) 01:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dan arndt: Jesus I Was Evil does not have any references and does not even mention the fact that it charted - could you work your magic on to that?--Laun chba ller 10:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Notability established by ARIA Charts and high rotation on a national radio network.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notability in print sources, irrespective of which print sources and charts issues. Meets WP:GNG. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not the highest-quality nomination - David Gerard (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.