Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EveryOne Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SKCRIT#1 - withdrawn with no delete votes. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EveryOne Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No RS currently in article. A BEFORE search for "EveryOne Group" on Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com finds no RS. No physical address on organization's official page, seemingly suggesting this is just a website that uses superlative phrases to describe its activity, or lack thereof. Chetsford (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Withdraw AfD as nominator. Since the original nomination, Nikoo.Amini has improved the article with references that weren't revealed during my initial BEFORE search and I'm now of the opinion it probably passes our GNG. Chetsford (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.