Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evermeet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms nations. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:38, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evermeet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't establish notability. TTN (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Forgotten Realms nations. BOZ (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. The article remains of limited quality since the previous AfD many years ago. I we have articles on the books about the city, and that seems reasonable. I'm not convinced that we need an article on the city itself. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect name only to List of Forgotten Realms nations. Not notable & there's nothing to merge as the article does not cite independent sources. The article content is unsourced original research and fancruft. Two citations offered are both to in-universe publications. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or Delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 08:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability. Jclemens (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge : Delete as it doesnt have independent reliable references,else merge with Evermeet: Island of Elves BetterSmile:D 06:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.