Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evergreen (music)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evergreen (music)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT TheLongTone (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not just WP:NOTDICT... the article creator seems to be unaware that "evergreen" is a term used to describe many things that are long-lasting, and is therefore not exclusively a music term. Richard3120 (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it, probably worth an entry in the evergreen disambig page???TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.