Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Lora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eve Lora[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece on an actress lacking multiple significant roles in notable productions. Lacks Coverage about her in independent reliable sources. Many sources are used to try make her look more notable but the sourcing is mainly imdb, youtube, blogs, shop, passing mentions and sources that don't mention her. Nothing better found. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks the significant coverage to establish notability. As written, the article is essentially spam. -- Whpq (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Formatting reveals nature of article, delete as per nom. C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 02:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. Once you remove the blogs, youtube videos, and linkedin pages you have nothing. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.