Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evdeizle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evdeizle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Website is unreachable, couldn't find any sources talking about the website winning "Golden Spider Web Awards". Even in the official website of the awards, when you check the results for 2005, you can't see this website, so that award seems like a lie. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 09:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 09:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 11:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The websites are no longer in use so it's presumably defunct. I can find no significant coverage: looks like it sunk without trace. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The single mention I could find was this single sentence in Expansión. Evdeizle existed, but it wasn't notable. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete According the website of the award [1], the "Best New Website in the Service Industry in Turkey" award doesn't even exist, thus they couldn't have won it. ~Styyx ^{Hi! ^-^} 19:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete for the reason given by Styyx about the award, it's lack of notability, and because I don't see a good enough keep reason coming along to change the consensus so far that it should be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, as nominator.--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 12:40, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.